| Rank | Name | Start HDCP |
End HDCP |
Factor | Rank | Name | Start HDCP |
End HDCP |
Factor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mitani, Michael T | 0.2 | +0.9 | 1.099 | 30 | Furumoto, Brent M | 11.0 | 11.1 | 0.996 | |
| 2 | Mizufuka, Ronald | 19.6 | 16.8 | 1.097 | 31 | Nakata, Jim | 8.1 | 8.2 | 0.995 | |
| 3 | Furumoto, Michael K | 13.5 | 11.4 | 1.090 | 32 | Aoki, Wayne T | 17.4 | 17.6 | 0.993 | |
| 4 | Endo, Edward F | 13.2 | 11.2 | 1.086 | 33 | Takeshita, Thomas R | 11.6 | 11.8 | 0.992 | |
| 5 | Masada, Jimmy M | 13.5 | 11.6 | 1.081 | 34 | Imoto, Eddie M | 22.3 | 22.9 | 0.983 | |
| 6 | Saignavong, Noy | 14.2 | 12.3 | 1.078 | 35 | Kato, Mike | 13.5 | 14.0 | 0.981 | |
| 7 | Fukutomi, Scott S | 17.8 | 15.9 | 1.068 | 36 | Kishi, Glenn K | 17.2 | 17.9 | 0.977 | |
| 8 | Kawakami, Sam M | 13.1 | 11.9 | 1.050 | 37 | Fukuma, Glenn T | 7.6 | 8.1 | 0.975 | |
| 9 | Naito, Masashi | 11.1 | 10.0 | 1.050 | 38 | Nishi, Kenneth | 21.9 | 22.9 | 0.971 | |
| 10 | Endo, Alan Y | 27.2 | 25.6 | 1.043 | 39 | Nishi, Norman | 9.8 | 10.5 | 0.969 | |
| 11 | Mitani, Dennis T | 15.6 | 14.6 | 1.038 | 40 | Matsuda, Kazuyoshi | 17.4 | 18.4 | 0.967 | |
| 12 | Tanimoto, David T | 10.6 | 9.8 | 1.037 | 41 | Tanioka, Kirk | 11.6 | 12.4 | 0.967 | |
| 13 | Inouye, Tamo | 13.1 | 12.4 | 1.029 | 42 | Matsuba, James | 16.1 | 17.1 | 0.966 | |
| 14 | Masada, Ryan | 16.7 | 15.9 | 1.029 | 43 | Hirami, Gary M | 11.3 | 12.2 | 0.963 | |
| 15 | Watanabe, Teruo | 24.6 | 23.6 | 1.028 | 44 | Nakamoto, Yuji | 21.4 | 22.7 | 0.963 | |
| 16 | Higashiyama, Robert | 23.1 | 22.2 | 1.026 | 45 | Nishitsuji, Gary | 12.7 | 13.8 | 0.957 | |
| 17 | Lam, Lucy | 19.2 | 18.5 | 1.023 | 46 | Takiguchi, Hiro | 11.4 | 12.5 | 0.955 | |
| 18 | Chow, Frank W | 13.2 | 12.7 | 1.020 | 47 | Futa, Walt T | 12.7 | 13.9 | 0.954 | |
| 19 | Saika, Larry C | 20.8 | 20.2 | 1.019 | 48 | Matsushita, Jeff | 11.1 | 12.4 | 0.947 | |
| 20 | Matsuguma, Mark | 14.0 | 13.7 | 1.012 | 49 | Nishi, Sharon | 11.9 | 13.3 | 0.945 | |
| 21 | Fukutomi, Buzz | 9.4 | 9.2 | 1.009 | 50 | Takeshita, Byron M | 20.1 | 22.0 | 0.944 | |
| 22 | Hankawa, Kenneth K | 12.1 | 11.9 | 1.008 | 51 | Lam, Ronald | 20.6 | 22.6 | 0.942 | |
| 23 | Nishikawa, Ken | 25.1 | 24.8 | 1.008 | 52 | Choi, Irving | 19.9 | 22.0 | 0.938 | |
| 24 | Yamasaki, Bruce E | 16.3 | 16.1 | 1.007 | 53 | Chow, Hubert | 10.8 | 12.7 | 0.923 | |
| 25 | Hayashi, Steve | 15.7 | 15.6 | 1.004 | 54 | Kikkawa, Sid | 17.5 | 20.3 | 0.913 | |
| 26 | Uyenoyama, Delta | 15.8 | 15.7 | 1.004 | 55 | Tsukamoto, Dr. Tim T. | 12.1 | 14.5 | 0.909 | |
| 27 | Higa, Patrica | 24.9 | 24.9 | 1.000 | 56 | Higa, Larry | 12.3 | 14.9 | 0.903 | |
| 28 | Suyeishi, Charles M | 36.4 | 36.4 | 1.000 | 57 | Shoji, Dean J | 16.8 | 19.9 | 0.903 | |
| 29 | Kamei, Linda | 19.0 | 19.1 | 0.997 | 58 | Kato, Gary M | 14.8 | 19.5 | 0.851 |
Most Improved Golfer Computation The USGA recommended method for determining a club's most improved player at the end of a season or year is as follows: Add 12* to the player's Handicap Index at the start of the season. This is value A. Add 12 to the player's Handicap Index at the end of the season. This is value B. Divide value A by value B, calculating to three decimal places. This is the improvement factor. The player with the highest improvement factor should receive the most improved player award. Example: Starting Handicap Index: 22.6 Ending Handicap Index: 17.4 Value A: 22.6 + 12 = 34.6 Value B: 17.4 + 12 = 29.4 A / B: 34.6 / 29.4 = 1.177 Improvement Factor: 1.177 *The number 12 have been determined by the USGA as equitable in gauging the improvement of players encompassing the entire spectrum of handicaps. For example, it is relatively the same improvement factor to go from a 20.0 to a 10.0 Handicap Index (improvement factor of 1.454) as it is to go from a 5.0 to a scratch, or zero Handicap Index (improvement factor of 1.416), yet the change in Handicap Index is "10" (20 - 10) versus "5" (5 - 0) strokes. The number 12 take into consideration the level of a player's improvement rather than the net change in Handicap Index. Please note: This ranking is for guidance only and should be carefully reviewed by the handicap committee and modified if necessary. There are many special situations which cannot be taken into account by the formula alone, especially if the club joined GHIN for the first time this year.